Picture
"Christians must use the societally-given privilege to speak out when not only Atheists, but all persons are abused, misrepresented, or slandered against. Sure, we can have the philosophical and theological discussions about what "Truth" "is," but before we are Atheists, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Rastafarian, Mormon, Taoist, or any other religion -- we are human."

On Monday evening I had the opportunity to hear Chris Stedman speak on the topic of Atheism and interfaith activism. Stedman refers to himself as a secular humanist and Atheist in order to help "clear the air" about what he understands his Atheism to be. The packed auditorium proved to be engaged, as the question and answer portion of the program provided ample conversation. As I listened to Stedman speak and people ask questions, I was reminded of the remarkable Christian privilege still at work today.

Transforming communities can prove difficult – bit of an understatement. With a remarkably polarized populace in America bridging gaps between belief systems is understandably challenging. I have found, and Stedman spoke to this point to, that we find ourselves competing for "Truth," instead of living into our common humanity. Christians, if they want to live out the call of Christ, need Atheists alongside them in their work. 

Including Atheists in the work Christians does not mean sacrificing one's own conception of "Truth." Instead, it offers an opportunity to dig deeper into what a person believes, and why they believe so. Critical faith, a thinking faith, emerges when people open themselves up to the "other." 

This is the challenge, isn't it? Opening ourselves to those who are "different," or don't "think like we do." How many opportunities or chances do we miss because we remained more concerned about not being wrong? Not only do we miss out on personal opportunities for transformation, our communities miss opportunities for growth and transformation. 

The question we must ask is not of whether or not we will sacrifice our "Truth." Rather, the question is of whether or not we care enough to open ourselves to the human in the "other." It can, to be sure, prove difficult to stand alongside those with whom we disagree, but we can still find common ground in our common humanity. What Stedman and others work for is not idle transformation, but societal transformation that beckons all people to see their deeper human potential. 

Yet even as there exists vast potential in this work, Christians need to recognize the powerful privilege that still drips over them. As a Christian myself I know that I have a far better chance of winning political office simply because I'm a Christian. If I were an Atheist, well, those chances diminish greatly. Christians, then, have a responsibility to utilize the larger societal privilege granted to them for positive transformation. 

When given air time because one is labeled a Christian, it must be utilized as an opportunity for bringing together, not separation. When given a "longer leash" within an institution because of Christian identity, Christians must find what truth-telling they can live out. 

Christians must use the societally-given privilege to speak out when not only Atheists, but all persons are abused, misrepresented, or slandered against. Sure, we can have the philosophical and theological discussions about what "Truth" "is," but before we are Atheists, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Rastafarian, Mormon, Taoist, or any other religion -- we are human. 

Christians -- conservative or liberal -- we need the Atheist.
Atheists -- Christians, and all people of faith need you. 

Let us work together in order that we might find a transformed humanity -- one that embraces people for who they are, not their religious identity or theistic identity. 
 


Comments

11/08/2011 22:59

I don't like being the guy who pops up on blogs he's never seen before to say, "I disagree," because, y'know, that's kinda mean. But a well-meaning Christian friend linked to this on Facebook and you seem like a well-meaning person, too, so I thought I would pop in and let you know that you're really not saying what you think you're saying. This post is actually dismissive, reductionist, and reeks of the same privilege you're trying to point out to your fellow Christians.

For whatever it's worth, I'm an atheist. I grew up Evangelical and within walking distance of Wheaton College (the one with the Billy Graham Center). I was accepted at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School before deciding that I was on a journey that would be taking me in a very different direction. So I've been on both sides of this fence.

If you'd stuck to this: "Let us work together in order that we might find a transformed humanity -- one that embraces people for who they are, not their religious identity or theistic identity," I would have absolutely no problem with this post and would be offering support and applause. But your journey to that point made me angry.

<i>Including Atheists in the work Christians does not mean sacrificing one's own conception of "Truth." Instead, it offers an opportunity to dig deeper into what a person believes, and why they believe so. Critical faith, a thinking faith, emerges when people open themselves up to the "other." </i>

Here you say that Atheists only exist to make Christians better at being Christians. If you are going to genuinely open yourself up to another point of view you cannot go in to that conversation with the notion that, "I have the Truth and you are just going to help me better understand it." That is, to put it lightly, arrogant and dismissive.

Moreover, saying, "We want to help atheists so we can be better Christians," is to other atheists in exactly the way you're trying to say you shouldn't. Also, I know of no atheists who make the word a proper noun. Why did you choose to do so here? Atheism is not a religion, after all.

<i>Yet even as there exists vast potential in this work, Christians need to recognize the powerful privilege that still drips over them. As a Christian myself I know that I have a far better chance of winning political office simply because I'm a Christian. If I were an Atheist, well, those chances diminish greatly. Christians, then, have a responsibility to utilize the larger societal privilege granted to them for positive transformation.</i>

This also bugs me for several vague reasons. It seems to boil down to you saying that atheists exist in the same space as pre-suffrage women and pre-Civil Rights Movement (or even 14th Amendment) blacks in America. Atheists have equal rights and equal protection. We don't need Christians to use their "larger social privilege." We need Christians to recognize that we live in a society that was designed as a secular society without religious privilege or religious tests to gain political office because a free and equal society is a society that is good for all people who live within its borders.

So, for whatever it's worth, I believe that your post is headed in the right direction. I just think that you should take a few minutes to attempt to examine the privilege and blindness you seem to be missing in your own thought processes. Yours might be a mote compared to a plank, but there's still something in your eye.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply