Picture
"May we think with our hearts in our minds, and see that all people deserve and must receive a live-giving education."

Though the achievement gap between white and black has narrowed in recent decades, the gap between rich and poor has only increased according to a New York Times article. This heightens the all-important conversation about taxes and spending both in Washington, D.C. and in state governments. Changing the current economic atmosphere, and insuring every child has a chance to succeed will require greater funding, and a change in the minds of Americans. Both are easier said than done. 

The question between rich and poor is more than a question about money--it's a question of time. Meredith Philips, associate professor of sociology at UCLA has found that by the time high-income children start school they have spent 400 hours more than poor children in literacy activities. Money allows for the ability to send children to daycare or preschool, which provides a greater opportunity for success. However, when parents must work 2 or 3 jobs to keep food on the table, parents are not able to spend time with their children reading Goodnight Moon or The Little Engine That Could
Picture
Source: NYTIMES
Researchers say that finding a solution is difficult, with one even remarking that "the cupboard is bare." His, perhaps, is a poor choice of words when speaking about this subject, but the point is made: solutions are being demanded when all the options have been tried. 

But have they?

This week North Carolina Governor Bev Perdue announced a 3/4-cent sales tax increase to help education remain at the top in the nation, and fund continual improvement. The sales tax had been allowed to expire by the Republican-dominated General Assembly in 2011. And, no, it's no surprise that people are willing to risk the education of young people in order to take more money home. 

Throwing money at the educational crisis, alone, will not solve it, but it certainly helps. We need to look at the entire structure. 

For example, in at-risk communities we need to put skilled technology training back into classrooms. While welding or carpentry might be helpful, newer computer training and manufacturing training will go much farther in this skilled-labor economy. These communities are the ones that will get the training, spend the money in the local area, and create new jobs for their fellow neighbors. Economic change happens when people have access to education and job skill training. 

Even as I write this, I know that no matter how many flashy graphs, sparkling charts, or powerful data one provides there will still be naysayers. Sadly enough, people are selfish and would rather take the easy way out when it comes to societal transformation. We are called to fight even stronger for all people, and to help others see that it's not about "us vs. them," but a deeper human issue. 

Our common humanity thrives when people choose to not only work together, but mutually enhance one another. From sea to shining sea we need education for this republic to improve. We need education so that we can foster future trumpets of peace and hope when the darker side of human existence begins to take over. We need education so that our future ancestors can live successful, peaceful, healthy lives. Tax cuts now live us deprived in the future. 

May we think with our hearts in our minds, and see that all people deserve and must receive a live-giving education. 

 


Comments

Pastor Alex
02/10/2012 1:04pm

The divide between rich and poor is about more than just educational time. It is also about the nutrition that children get or don't get and how it effects their ability to learn. Whether child or adult, hunger makes one slower to take in new stuff. To solve the problem we need to make sure that all are fed.

Reply
02/24/2012 2:00am

I have argued for a number of years that it is the intent of the right wing to eliminate public schools. Their solution up to this point has been has been to look at school's admitted deficiencies (which typically are due to lack of funding), blame them for those deficiencies and justify redirecting funding or cutting it altogether. School systems typically cannot pay salaries necessary to keep good teachers, so they pay some teachers more by bonuses or stipends which, of course come from the paychecks of others. Teachers typically do not work for the paycheck; stipends therefore do not produce better teaching in the long run. Noting that stipends and bonuses don't really work, the right wingers can reduce salaries and funding further.
Rick Perry here in Texas argued that teacher unions were responsible for poor performance, but unions here are quite weak and have little significance. Rick Santorum finally said the big secret out loud in the last debate, arguing that the fed and state governments have no business in public education and that all public schools should be funded locally. Unfortunately, local governments have such have so very little taxing power that they cannot possibly fund schools.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply